JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 9, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Sin Información·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Eps Por Practica De Aborto
  • Oficiar a autoridades involucradas para que remitan informes solicitados en auto A327/10
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Mediante el presente auto se ordena oficiar a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, a la Defensoría del Pueblo y a los Ministerios de Educación Nacional y Protección Social, para que remitan a la Sala de Revisión los informes solicitados de manera previa a través del Auto 327 de 2010.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Por Secretaría General de esta Corporación líbrese oficio a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, a la Defensoría del Pueblo, al Ministerio de Educación Nacional y al Ministerio de Protección Social para que, dentro de los ocho (8) días siguientes a la notificación del presente auto, remitan a esta Sala los informes solicitados en los numerales
  2. primero. y
  3. séptimo. del Auto 327 de 2010.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.